|
|
| [hide]This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. |
|---|
| This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. (November 2012) |
| This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. (November 2012) |
|
|
Timur (
Persian:
تیمور
Timūr,
Chagatai:
Temür;
d. 18 February 1405), historically known as
Tamerlane[1] (
Persian:
تيمور لنگ
Timūr(-e) Lang, "Timur the Lame"), was a
Turko-Mongol conqueror and the founder of the
Timurid dynasty in
Central Asia.
[2] Born into the
Barlas confederation in
Transoxianaduring the 1320s or 1330s, he gained control of
Western Chagatai Khanate by 1370. From that base, he led military campaigns across
West,
South and
Central Asia and emerged as the most powerful ruler in the
Muslim world after defeating the
Mamluks of
Egypt and
Syria, the emerging
Ottoman Empire and the declining
Sultanate of Delhi. From these conquests he founded the
Timurid Empire, although it fragmented shortly after his death. He is considered the last of the great
nomadic conquerors of the
Eurasian steppe, and his empire set the stage for rise of the more structured and lasting
gunpowder empires in the 1500s and 1600s.
[3][4]:1
Timur's armies were feared throughout Asia, Africa, and Europe,
[7] sizable parts of which were laid waste by his campaigns.
[8] Scholars estimate that his military campaigns caused the deaths of 17 million people, amounting to about
5% of the world population.
[9][10]
He was the grandfather of
Ulugh Beg, who ruled Central Asia from 1411 to 1449, and the great-great-great-grandfather of
Babur, founder of the
Mughal Empire, which ruled parts of
South Asia for around four centuries, from 1526 until 1857.
[11][12] Timur is also recognized as a great patron of art and architecture, as he interacted with
Muslim intellectuals such as
Ibn Khaldunand
Hafiz-i Abru.
[7]:341–2
EARLY LIFE
Emir Timur feasts in the gardens of
Samarkand.
Later
Timurid dynastic histories claim that he was born on 8 April 1336, but most sources from his lifetime give ages that are consistent with a birthdate in the late 1320s. Historian
Beatrice Forbes Manz suspects the 1336 date was an invention designed to tie Timur to the legacy of
Abu Sa'id Bahadur Khan, the last ruler of the
Ilkhanate descended from
Hülegü, who died in that year.
[22]
At the age of eight or nine, Timur and his mother and brothers were carried as prisoners to Samarkand by an invading Mongol army.
In his childhood, Timur and a small band of followers raided travelers for goods, especially animals such as sheep, horses, and cattle.
[22]:116 In around 1363, it is believed that Timur tried to steal a sheep from a shepherd but was shot by two arrows, one in his right leg and another in his right hand, where he lost two fingers. Both injuries crippled him for life. Some believe that Timur suffered his crippling injuries while serving as a mercenary to the khan of
Sistan in
Khorasan in what is known today as Dasht-i Margo (Desert of Death) in south-west Afghanistan. Timur's injuries have given him the names of Timur the Lame and Tamerlane by Europeans.
[7]:31
Timur was a Muslim, but while his chief official religious counselor and adviser was the
Hanafi scholar 'Abdu 'l-Jabbar Khwarazmi, his particular beliefs are not known. In Tirmidh, he had come under the influence of his spiritual mentor
Sayyid Barakah, a leader from
Balkh who is buried alongside Timur in
Gur-e Amir.
[23][24][25] Timur was known to hold
Ali and the
Ahlul Bayt in high regard and has been noted by various scholars for his "pro-
Alid" stance. Despite this, Timur was noted for attacking Shiites on Sunni grounds and therefore his own religious inclinations remain unclear.
[26]
PERSONALITY
Timur is regarded as a military genius and a tactician, with an uncanny ability to work within a highly fluid political structure to win and maintain a loyal following of nomads during his rule in Central Asia. He was also considered extraordinarily intelligent - not only intuitively but also intellectually.
[4]:16 In Samarkand and his many travels, Timur, under the guidance of distinguished scholars was able to learn the Persian, Mongolian, and Turkic languages.
[7]:9 More importantly, Timur was characterized as an opportunist. Taking advantage of his Turco-Mongolian heritage, Timur frequently used either the Islamic religion or the law and traditions of the Mongol Empire to achieve his military goals or domestic political aims.
[7]
MILITARY LEADER
In about 1360 Timur gained prominence as a military leader whose troops were mostly Turkic tribesmen of the region.
[19] He took part in campaigns in
Transoxiana with
the Khan of
Chagatai. His career for the next ten or eleven years may be thus briefly summarized from the
Memoirs. Allying himself both in cause and by family connection with Kurgan, the dethroner and destroyer of
Volga Bulgaria, he was to invade
Khorasan at the head of a thousand horsemen. This was the second military expedition that he led, and its success led to further operations, among them the subjugation of
Khorezm and
Urganj.
Following Kurgan's murder, disputes arose among the many claimants to
sovereign power; this infighting was halted by the invasion of the energetic Chagtaid
Tughlugh Timur of
Kashgar, another descendant of Genghis Khan. Timur was dispatched on a mission to the invader's camp, which resulted in his own appointment to the head of his own tribe, the
Barlas, in place of its former leader,
Hajji Beg.
The exigencies of Timur's quasi-sovereign position compelled him to have recourse to his formidable patron, whose reappearance on the banks of the
Syr Darya created a consternation not easily allayed. One of Tughlugh's sons was entrusted with the Barlas's territory, along with the rest of
Mawarannahr (Transoxiana), but he was defeated in battle by the bold warrior he had replaced, at the head of a numerically inferior force.
RISE TO POWER
It was in this period that Timur reduced the
Chagatai khans to the position of
figureheads while he ruled in their name. Also during this period, Timur and his brother-in-law Husayn, who were at first fellow fugitives and wanderers in joint adventures, became rivals and antagonists. The relationship between them began to become strained after Husayn abandoned efforts to carry out Timur's orders to finish off Ilya Khoja (former governor of Mawarannah) close to Tishnet.
[7]:40
Timur began to gain a following of people in Balkh, consisting of merchants, fellow tribesmen, Muslim clergy, aristocracy and agricultural workers, because of his kindness in sharing his belongings with them. This contrasted Timur's behavior with that of Husayn, who alienated these people, took many possessions from them via his heavy tax laws and selfishly spent the tax money building elaborate structures.
[7]:41–2 At around 1370 Husayn surrendered to Timur and was later assassinated, which allowed Timur to be formally proclaimed sovereign at
Balkh. He married Husayn's wife
Saray Mulk Khanum, a descendant of Genghis Khan, allowing him to become imperial ruler of the Chaghatay tribe.
[7]
One day Aksak Temür spoke thusly:
"Khan Züdei (in China) rules over the city. We now number fifty to sixty men, so let us elect a leader." So they drove a stake into the ground and said: "We shall run thither and he among us who is the first to reach the stake, may he become our leader". So they ran and Aksak Timur, as he was lame, lagged behind, but before the others reached the stake he threw his cap onto it. Those who arrived first said: "We are the leaders." ["But,"] Aksak Timur said: "My head came in first, I am the leader." Meanwhile, an old man arrived and said: "The leadership should belong to Aksak Timur; your feet have arrived but, before then, his head reached the goal." So they made Aksak Timur their prince.
[27][28]
LEGITIMIZATION OF TIMUR'S RULE
Timur's Turco-Mongolian heritage provided opportunities and challenges as he sought to rule the Mongol Empire and the Muslim world. According to the Mongol traditions, Timur could not claim the title of
khan or rule the Mongol Empire because he was not a descendant of Genghis Khan. Therefore, Timur set up a puppet Chaghatay khan, Suyurghatmish, as the nominal ruler of Balkh as he pretended to act as a "protector of the member of a Chinggisid line, that of Genghis Khan's eldest son, Jochi."
[29]
As a result, Timur never used the title of
khan because the name khan could only be used by those who come from the same lineage as Genghis Khan himself. Timur instead used the title of
amir meaning general, and acting in the name of the
Chagatai ruler of Transoxania.
[22]:106
To reinforce his position in the Mongol Empire, Timur managed to acquire the royal title of son-in-law when he married a princess of Chinggisid descent.
[4]:14
Likewise, Timur could not claim the supreme title of the Islamic world, caliph, because the "office was limited to the Quraysh, the tribe of the Prophet Muhammad." Therefore, Timur reacted to the challenge by creating a myth and image of himself as a "supernatural personal power"" ordained by God.
[29] Since Timur had a successful career as a conqueror, it was easy to justify his rule as ordained and favored by God since no ordinary man could be a possessor of such good fortune that resistance would be seen as opposing the will of God. Moreover, the Islamic notion that military and political success was the result of Allah's favor had long been successfully exploited by earlier rulers. Therefore, Timur's assertions would not have seemed unbelievable to fellow Islamic people.
PERIOD OF EXPANSION
Timur besieges the historic city of
Urganj.
Emir Timur's army attacks the survivors of the town of Nerges, in Georgia, in the spring of 1396.
Timur spent the next 35 years in various
wars and expeditions. He not only consolidated his rule at home by the subjugation of his foes, but sought extension of territory by encroachments upon the lands of foreign potentates. His conquests to the west and northwest led him to the lands near the
Caspian Sea and to the banks of the
Ural and the
Volga. Conquests in the south and south-West encompassed almost every province in
Persia, including
Baghdad,
Karbala and Northern Iraq.
One of the most formidable of Timur's opponents was another Mongol ruler, a descendant of Genghis Khan named
Tokhtamysh. After having been a refugee in Timur's court,
Tokhtamysh became ruler both of the eastern
Kipchak and the
Golden Horde. After his accession, he quarreled with Timur over the possession of
Khwarizm and
Azerbaijan. However, Timur still supported him against the Russians and in 1382 Tokhtamysh invaded the Muscovite dominion and burned
Moscow.
[30]
After the death of
Abu Sa'id, ruler of the
Ilkhanid Dynasty, in 1335, there was a power vacuum in Persia. In 1383, Timur started the military conquest of Persia. He captured
Herat, Khorasan and all eastern Persia by 1385; he captured almost all of Persia by 1387. Of note during the Persian campaign was the capture of
Isfahan. When
Isfahan surrendered to Timur in 1387, he treated it with relative mercy as he normally did with cities that surrendered. However, after the city revolted against Timur's taxes by killing the tax collectors and some of Timur's soldiers. Timur ordered the massacre of the city's citizens with the death toll reckoned at between 100,000 and 200,000.
[31] An eye-witness counted more than 28 towers constructed of about 1,500 heads each.
[32] This has been described as a "systematic use of terror against towns...an integral element of Tamerlane's strategic element" which he viewed as preventing bloodshed by discouraging resistance. His massacres were selective and he spared the artistic and technical (e.g. engineers) elites.
[31]
In the meantime Tokhtamysh, now khan of the
Golden Horde, turned against his patron and in 1385 invaded
Azerbaijan. The inevitable response by Timur resulted in the
Tokhtamysh–Timur war. In the initial stage of the war Timur won a victory at the
Battle of the Kondurcha River. After the battle Tokhtamysh and some of his army were allowed to escape. After Tokhtamysh's initial defeat Timur invaded Muscovy to the north of Tokhtamysh's holdings. Timur's army burned
Ryazan and advanced on Moscow. He was pulled away before reaching the Oka River by Tokhtamysh's renewed campaign in the south.
[30]
In the first phase of the conflict with Tokhtamysh, Timur led an army of over 100,000 men north for more than 700 miles into the steppe. He then rode west about 1,000 miles advancing in a front more than 10 miles wide. During this advance Timur's army got far enough north to be in a region of
very long summer days causing complaints by his Muslim soldiers about keeping a long schedule of
prayers.It was then that Tokhtamysh's army was boxed in against the east bank of the Volga River in the
Orenburg region and destroyed at the
Battle of the Kondurcha River.
It was in the second phase of the conflict that Timur took a different route against the enemy by invading the realm of Tokhtamysh via the
Caucasus region. The year 1395 saw the
Battle of the Terek River concluding the titanic struggle between the two monarchs.
Tokhtamysh was not able to restore his power or prestige. He was killed about a decade after the Terek River battle in the area of present day
Tyumen.
During the course of Timur's campaigns his army destroyed
Sarai, the capital of the Golden Horde, and
Astrakhan, subsequently disrupting the Golden Horde's
Silk Road. The Golden Horde no longer held power after the coming of Timur.
In May 1393 Timur's army invaded the
Anjudan. This crippled the
Ismaili village only one year after his assault on the Ismailis in
Mazandaran. The village was prepared for the attack. This is evidenced by it containing a fortress and a system of underground tunnels. Undeterred, Timur's soldiers flooded the tunnels by cutting into a channel overhead. Timur's reasons for attacking this village are not yet well-understood. However, it has been suggested that his
religious persuasionsand view of himself as an
executor of divine will may have contributed to his motivations.
[33] The Persian historian
Khwandamir explains that an Ismaili presence was growing more politically powerful in Persian
Iraq. A group of locals in the region was dissatisfied with this and, Khwandamir writes, these locals assembled and brought up their complaint with Timur, possibly provoking his attack on the Ismailis there.
[33]
CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE TUGHLAQ DYNASTY
Timur defeats the
Sultan of Delhi, Nasir Al-Din Mahmud Tughluq, in the winter of 1397–1398, painting dated 1595–1600.
Timur crossed the Indus River at
Attock (now
Pakistan) on 24 September 1398. His invasion did not go unopposed and he encountered resistance by the Governor of
Meerut during the march to Delhi. Timur was still able to continue his approach to Delhi, arriving in 1398, to fight the armies of Sultan Nasir-ud-Din Mahmud Shah Tughluq, which had already been weakened by a succession struggle within the royal family.
Capture of Delhi (1398)
The battle took place on 17 December 1398. Sultan Nasir-ud-Din Mahmud Shah Tughluq and Mallu Iqbal's
[37] army had war elephants armored with chain mail and poison on their tusks.
[7]:267 With his Tatar forces afraid of the elephants, Timur ordered his men to dig a trench in front of their positions. Timur then loaded his camels with as much wood and hay as they could carry. When the war elephants charged, Timur set the hay on fire and prodded the camels with iron sticks, causing them to charge at the elephants howling in pain: Timur had understood that elephants were easily panicked. Faced with the strange spectacle of camels flying straight at them with flames leaping from their backs, the elephants turned around and stampeded back toward their own lines. Timur capitalized on the subsequent disruption in Nasir-ud-Din Mahmud Shah Tughluq's forces, securing an easy victory. Delhi was sacked and left in ruins. Before the battle for Delhi, Timur executed 100,000 captives:
[12]
The capture of the Delhi Sultanate was one of Timur's greatest victories, arguably surpassing the likes of
Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan because of the harsh conditions of the journey and the achievement of taking down one of the richest cities at the time. After Delhi fell to Timur's army, uprisings by its citizens against the Turkic-Mongols began to occur, causing a bloody massacre within the city walls. After three days of citizens uprising within Delhi, it was said that the city reeked of decomposing bodies of its citizens with their heads being erected like structures and the bodies left as food for the birds. Timur's invasion and destruction of Delhi continued the chaos that was still consuming India and the city would not be able to recover from the great loss it suffered for almost a century.
[7]:269–274
CAMPAIGNS IN THE LEVANT
Before the end of 1399, Timur started a war with
Bayezid I, sultan of the Ottoman Empire, and the
Mamluk sultan of Egypt
Nasir-ad-Din Faraj. Bayezid began annexing the territory of Turkmen and Muslim rulers in
Anatolia. As Timur claimed sovereignty over the
Turkmen rulers, they took refuge behind him.
Then Timur turned his attention to Syria, sacking
Aleppo[39] and
Damascus.
[40] The city's inhabitants were massacred, except for the artisans, who were deported to Samarkand.
He invaded Baghdad in June 1401. After the capture of the city, 20,000 of its citizens were massacred. Timur ordered that every soldier should return with at least two severed human heads to show him. (Many warriors were so scared they killed prisoners captured earlier in the campaign just to ensure they had heads to present to Timur.)
[citation needed]
Shakh-i Zindeh mosque, Samarkand.
In the meantime, years of insulting letters had passed between Timur and Bayezid. Finally, Timur invaded Anatolia and defeated Bayezid in the
Battle of Ankara on 20 July 1402. Bayezid was captured in battle and subsequently died in captivity, initiating the twelve-year
Ottoman Interregnum period. Timur's stated motivation for attacking Bayezid and the Ottoman Empire was the restoration of
Seljuq authority. Timur saw the Seljuks as the rightful rulers of
Anatolia as they had been granted rule by Mongol conquerors, illustrating again Timur's interest with Genghizid legitimacy.
After the Ankara victory, Timur's army ravaged Western Anatolia, with Muslim writers complaining that the Timurid army acted more like a horde of savages than that of a civilized conqueror.
[citation needed] But Timur did take the city of Smyrna, a stronghold of the Christian
Knights Hospitalers, thus he referred to himself as
ghazior "Warrior of Islam".
Timur was furious at the
Genoese and
Venetians whose ships ferried the Ottoman army to safety in
Thrace. As
Lord Kinross reported in
The Ottoman Centuries, the Italians preferred the enemy they could handle to the one they could not.
While Timur invaded Anatolia,
Qara Yusuf assaulted Baghdad and captured it in 1402. Timur returned to Persia from Anatolia and sent his grandson Abu Bakr ibn Miran Shah to reconquer Baghdad, which he proceeded to do. Timur then spent some time in
Ardabil, where he gave
Ali Safavi, leader of the
Safaviyya, a number of captives. Subsequently, he marched to Khorasan and then to Samarkhand, where he spent nine months celebrating and preparing to invade Mongolia and China.
[41]
He ruled over an empire that, in modern times, extends from southeastern
Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and
Iran, through
Central Asia encompassing part of
Kazakhstan,
Afghanistan,
Armenia,
Azerbaijan,
Georgia,
Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan,
Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, and even approaches
Kashgar in China. The conquests of Timur are claimed to have caused the deaths of up to 17 million people, an assertion impossible to verify.
[42]
Of Timur's four sons, two (Jahangir and Umar Shaykh) predeceased him. His third son,
Miran Shah, died soon after Timur, leaving the youngest son, Shah Rukh. Although his designated successor was his grandson
Pir Muhammad b. Jahangir, Timur was ultimately succeeded in power by his son Shah Rukh. His most illustrious descendant
Babur founded the Islamic
Mughal Empire and ruled over most of
Afghanistan and
North India. Babur's descendants
Humayun,
Akbar,
Jahangir,
Shah Jahan and
Aurangzeb, expanded the Mughal Empire to most of the
Indian subcontinent.
Markham, in his introduction to the narrative of Clavijo's embassy, states that his body "was embalmed with musk and rose water, wrapped in linen, laid in an ebony coffin and sent to Samarkand, where it was buried." His tomb, the
Gur-e Amir, still stands in Samarkand, though it has been heavily restored in recent years.
ATTEMPTS TO ATTACK THE MING DYNASTY
The fortress at
Jiayuguan was strengthened due to fear of an invasion by Timur, while he led an army towards China.
[43]
By 1368 the new Chinese
Ming Dynasty had driven the
Mongols out of
China. The first
Ming Emperor
Hongwu and his son
Yongledemanded and received, homage from many Central Asian states as the political heirs to the former House of
Kublai. The Ming emperor's treatment of Timur as a
vassal did not sit well with the conqueror. In 1394 Hongwu's ambassadors eventually presented Timur with a letter addressing him as a subject. He summarily had the ambassadors
Fu An, Guo Ji, and Liu Wei detained. He then had them and their 1,500 guards executed.
[44] Neither Hongwu's next ambassador,
Chen Dewen (1397), nor the delegation announcing the accession of the Yongle Emperor fared any better.
[44]
Timur eventually planned to conquer China. To this end Timur made an alliance with the
Mongols of the
Northern Yuan Dynasty and prepared all the way to Bukhara. The Mongol leader
Enkhe Khan sent his grandson
Öljei Temür, also known as Buyanshir Khan after he converted to
Islam while he stayed at the court of Timur in Samarkand.
[45] In December 1404 Timur started military campaigns against the Ming Dynasty and detained a Ming envoy. But he was attacked by fever and plague when encamped on the farther side of the Sihon (
Syr-Daria) and died at Atrar (
Otrar) on 17 February 1405
[46]before ever reaching the Chinese border.
[47] Only after that were the Ming envoys released.
[44]
Timur preferred to fight his battles in the spring. However, he died en route during an uncharacteristic winter campaign against the ruling Chinese
Ming Dynasty. It was one of the bitterest winters on record. His troops are recorded as having to dig through five feet of ice to reach drinking water.
SUCCESSION
The Timurid empire at Timur's death in 1405
Just before his death, Timur designated his grandson
Pir Muhammad ibn Jahangiras his successor. However, his other descendants did not abide by this wish, and spent the next fifteen years engaged in violent infighting.
EXCHANGES WITH EUROPE
Timur had numerous
epistolary and diplomatic exchanges with various European states, especially Spain and France.
Relations between the court of
Henry III of Castile and that of Timur played an important part in medieval Spanish
Castilian diplomacy. In 1402, the time of the Battle of Ankara, two Spanish ambassadors were already with Timur: Pelayo de Sotomayor and Fernando de Palazuelos. Later, Timur sent to the court of
Castile and
León a
Chagatayambassador named
Hajji Muhammad al-Qazi with letters and gifts.
In return, Henry III of Castile sent a famous embassy to Timur's court in Samarkand in 1403–06, led by
Ruy Gonzales de Clavijo, with two other ambassadors, Alfonso Paez and Gomez de Salazar. On their return, Timur affirmed that he regarded the king of Castile "as his very own son".
According to Clavijo, Timur's good treatment of the Spanish delegation contrasted with the disdain shown by his host toward the envoys of the "lord of
Cathay" (i.e., the
Ming DynastyYongle Emperor), the Chinese ruler. Clavijo's visit to Samarkand allowed him to report to the European audience on the news from
Cathay (China), which few Europeans had been able to visit directly in the century that had passed since the travels of
Marco Polo.
The French archives preserve:
- A 30 July 1402 letter from Timur to Charles VI of France, suggesting that he send traders to the Orient. It is written in Persian.[48]
- A May 1403 letter. This is a Latin transcription of a letter from Timur to Charles VI, and another from Amiza Miranchah, his son, to the Christian princes, announcing their victory over Bayezid, in Smyrna.[49]
A copy has been kept of the answer of Charles VI to Timur, dated 15 June 1403.
[50]
LEGACY
Timur's legacy is a mixed one. While Central Asia blossomed under his reign, other places such as
Baghdad,
Damascus,
Delhi and other Arab,
Georgian, Persian, and Indian cities were sacked and destroyed and their populations massacred. He was responsible for the effective destruction of the Christian Church in much of Asia. Thus, while Timur still retains a positive image in Muslim Central Asia, he is vilified by many in
Arabia, Persia, and
India, where some of his greatest atrocities were carried out. However,
Ibn Khaldunpraises Timur for having unified much of the Muslim world when other conquerors of the time could not.
[51]
Timur's short-lived empire also melded the
Turko-Persian tradition in
Transoxiania, and in most of the territories which he incorporated into his
fiefdom,
Persian became the primary
language of administration and literary culture (
diwan), regardless of
ethnicity.
[52] In addition, during his reign, some contributions to Turkic literature were penned, with Turkic cultural influence expanding and flourishing as a result. A literary form of
Chagatai Turkic came into use alongside Persian as both a cultural and an official language.
[53]
Tamerlane virtually exterminated the
Church of the East, also known to Westerners as the
Nestorian church, which had previously been a major branch of Christianity but afterwards was largely confined to certain parts of
Iraq.
[54]
Timur became a relatively popular figure in Europe for centuries after his death, mainly because of his victory over the Ottoman Sultan Bayezid. The Ottoman armies were at the time invading Eastern Europe and Timur was ironically seen as a sort of ally.
Timur has now been officially recognized as a national hero of newly independent
Uzbekistan. His monument in Tashkent now occupies the place where
Marx's statue once stood.
The
Sharif of the
Hijaz suffers due to the divisive sectarian schisms of his faith, And lo! that young
Tatar(Timur) has boldly re-envisioned magnanimous victories of overwhelming conquest.
Historical sources
As Timurid-sponsored histories, the two
Zafaramas present a dramatically different picture from Arabshah's chronicle.
William Jones remarked that the former presented Timur as a "liberal, benevolent and illustrious prince", while the latter painted him as "deformed and impious, of a low birth and detestable principles."
[citation needed]
Malfuzat-i Timuri
The
Malfuzat-i Timurī and the appended
Tuzūk-i Tīmūrī, supposedly Timur's own
autobiography, are almost certainly 17th century fabrications.
[12][56] The scholar Abu Taleb Hosayni presented the texts to the Mughal emperor
Shah Jahan, a distant descendent of Timur, in 1637–38, supposedly after discovering the
Chagatai Turkish originals in the library of a Yemeni ruler. Due to the distance between Yemen and Timur's base in
Transoxania and the lack of any other evidence of the originals, most historians consider the story highly implausible and suspect Hosayni of inventing both the text and its origin story.
[56]
European views
Timur arguably had the most impact on the
Renaissance culture and early modern Europe.
[57] His achievements have both fascinated and horrified Europeans from the fifteenth century to the early nineteenth century.
European views of Timur were mixed throughout the fifteenth century with some European countries calling him an ally, while others saw him as a threat to Europe because of his rapid expansion and brutality.
[58]:341
When Timur captured the Ottoman Sultan
Bayezid at
Ankara, he was often praised and seen as a trusted ally by European rulers such as
Charles VI of France and
Henry IV of England because they believe he was saving Christianity from the Turkish Empire in the Middle East. Those two kings also praised him because his victory at Ankara allowed Christian merchants to remain in the Middle East and allowed for their safe return home to both France and England. Timur was also praised because it is believed that he helped restore the right of passage for Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land.
[58]:341–44
Other Europeans viewed Timur as a barbaric enemy who presented a threat to both European culture and the religion of Christianity. His rise to power moved many leaders, such as
Henry III of Castile, to send embassies to Samarkand to personally scout out Timur, learn about his people, make alliances with him and to try to convince him to convert to Christianity in order to avoid war.
[58]:348–49
In the introduction to a 1723 translation of Yazdi's
Zafaranameh, the translator wrote:
[59]
[
M. Petis de la Croix] tells us, that there are calumnies and impostures, which have been published by authors of romances, and Turkish writers who were his enemies, and envious at his glory: among whom is
Ahmed Bin Arabschah…As Timur-Bec had conquered the Turks and Arabians of Syria, and had even taken the
Sultan Bajazet prisoner, it is no wonder that he has been misrepresented by the historians of those nations, who, in despite of truth, and against the dignity of history, have fallen into great excesses on this subject.
Exhumation
A forensic facial reconstruction of Timur by
M. Gerasimov (1941).
Timur's body was
exhumed from his tomb in 1941 by the
Soviet anthropologist Mikhail M. Gerasimov. From his bones it was clear that Timur was a tall and broad chested man with strong cheek bones. Gerasimov reconstructed the likeness of Timur from his skull. At 5 feet 8 inches (1.73 meters), Timur was tall for his era. Gerasimov also confirmed Timur's lameness due to a hip injury. Gerasimov also found that Timur's facial characteristics conformed to that of Mongoloid features with somewhat Caucasoid admixture. In the study of "Anthropological composition of the population of Central Asia" shows the cranium of Timur predominate the characters of the South Siberian Mongoloid type.
[60] Timur is classified as being closer to the Mongoloid race with some admixture.
It is alleged that Timur's tomb was inscribed with the words, "When I rise from the dead, the world shall tremble." It is also said that when Gerasimov exhumed the body, an additional inscription inside the casket was found reading, "Who ever opens my tomb, shall unleash an invader more terrible than I."
[61] In any case, the same day Gerasimov begun the exhumation, Adolf Hitler launched
Operation Barbarossa, the largest military invasion of all time, upon the USSR.
[62] Timur was re-buried with full Islamic ritual in November 1942 just before the Soviet victory at the
Battle of Stalingrad.
[63]
In the arts
- Tamburlaine the Great, Parts I and II (English, 1563–1594): play by Christopher Marlowe
- Tamerlane (1701): play by Nicholas Rowe (English)
- Tamerlano (1724): opera by George Frideric Handel, in Italian, based on the 1675 play Tamerlan ou la mort de Bajazetby Jacques Pradon.
- Bajazet (1735): opera by Antonio Vivaldi, portrays the capture of Bayezid I by Timur
- Il gran Tamerlano (1772): opera by Josef Mysliveček that also portrays the capture of Bayezid I by Timur
- Tamerlane: first published poem of Edgar Allan Poe (American, 1809–1849).
- Timur is the deposed, blind former King of Tartary and father of the protagonist Calaf in the opera Turandot (1924) byGiacomo Puccini, libretto by Giuseppe Adami and Renato Simoni.
- Timour appears in the story Lord of Samarkand by Robert E. Howard.
- Tamerlan: novel by Colombian writer Enrique Serrano in Spanish[64]
- Tamburlaine: Shadow of God: a BBC Radio 3 play by John Fletcher, broadcast 2008, is a fictitious account of an encounter between Tamburlaine, Ibn Khaldun, and Hafez.
- Tamerlane (1928): historical novel by Harold Lamb.
GALLERY
Geometric courtyard surrounding the tomb showing the Iwan, and dome.
-
-
-
-
-
-
DESCENDANTS OF TIMUR
Sons of Timur
Sons of Jahangir
Sons of Umar Shaikh Mirza I
Sons of Miran Shah
Sons of Shahrukh Mirza
SEE ALSO
NOTES
- Jump up^ //
- Jump up^ Josef W. Meri (2005). Medieval Islamic Civilization. Routledge. p. 812.
- Jump up^ Darwin, John (2008). After Tamerlane: the rise and fall of global empires, 1400-2000. Bloomsbury Press. pp. 29, 92.ISBN 9781596917606.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Manz, Beatrice Forbes (1989). The rise and rule of Tamerlane. Cambridge University Press.
- Jump up^ Beatrice Forbes Manz, Temür and the Problem of a Conqueror's Legacy, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Third Series, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Apr., 1998), 25; "In his formal correspondance Temur continued throughout his life as the restorer of Chinggisid rights. He even justified his Iranian, Mamluk and Ottoman campaigns as a re-imposition of legitimate Mongol control over lands taken by usurpers...".
- Jump up^ Michal Biran, The Chaghadaids and Islam: The Conversion of Tarmashirin Khan (1331–34) , Journal of American Oriental Society, Vol. 122, No. 4 (Oct. – Dec., 2002), 751; "Temur, a non-Chinggisid, tried to build a double legitimacy based on his role as both guardian and restorer of the Mongol Empire.".
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k Marozzi, Justin (2004). Tamerlane: Sword of Islam, conqueror of the world. HarperCollins.
- Jump up^ Matthew White: Atrocitology: Humanity's 100 Deadliest Achievements, Canongate Books, 2011, ISBN 9780857861252, section "Timur"
- Jump up^ "The Rehabilitation Of Tamerlane". Chicago Tribune. 17 January 1999.
- Jump up^ J.J. Saunders, The history of the Mongol conquests(page 174), Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1971, ISBN 0812217667
- Jump up^ "Timur". Encyclopædia Britannica, Online Academic Edition. 2007.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Beatrice F. Manz (2000). "Tīmūr Lang".Encyclopaedia of Islam 10 (2nd ed. ed.). Brill. Retrieved24 April 2014.
- ^ Jump up to:a b "Tamerlane". AsianHistory. Retrieved 1 November2013.
- Jump up^ "Central Asia, history of Timur", in Encyclopædia Britannica, Online Edition, 2007. (Quotation:"...Under his leadership, Timur united the Mongol tribes located in the basins of the two rivers.")
- Jump up^ "Islamic world", in Encyclopædia Britannica, Online Edition, 2007. Quotation: "Timur (Tamerlane) was of Mongol descent and he aimed to restore Mongol power...."
- Jump up^ Carter V. Findley, The Turks in World History, Oxford University Press, 2005, Oxford University Press, 2005, ISBN 978-0-19-517726-8, p. 101.
- Jump up^ G. R. Garthwaite, "The Persians", Malden, ISBN 978-1-55786-860-2, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2007. (p.148) Quotation:...Timur's tribe, the Barlas, had Mongol origins but had become Turkic-speaking ... However, the Barlus tribe is considered one of the original Mongol tribes and there are "Barlus Ovogton" people who belong to Barlus tribe in modern Mongolia.
- Jump up^ M.S. Asimov & Clifford Edmund Bosworth, History of Civilizations of Central Asia, UNESCO Regional Office, 1998, ISBN 92-3-103467-7, p. 320: "... One of his followers was [...] Timur of the Barlas tribe. This Mongol tribe had settled [...] in the valley of Kashka Darya, intermingling with the Turkish population, adopting their religion (Islam) and gradually giving up its own nomadic ways, like a number of other Mongol tribes in Transoxania ..."
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Gérard Chaliand, Nomadic Empires: From Mongolia to the Danube translated by A.M. Berrett, Transaction Publishers, 2004. translated by A.M. Berrett. Transaction Publishers, p.75. ISBN 0-7658-0204-X. Limited preview atGoogle Books. p. 75., ISBN 0-7658-0204-X, p.75.,"Timur Leng (Tamerlane) Timur, known as the lame (1336–1405) was a Muslim Turk. He aspired to recreate the empire of his ancestors. He was a military genius who loved to play chess in his spare time to improve his military tactics and skill. And although he wielded absolute power, he never called himself more than an emir.", "Timur Leng (Tamerlane) Timur, known as the lame (1336–1405) was a Muslim Turk from the Umus of Chagatai who saw himself as Genghis Khan's heir."
- Jump up^ Timur did not claim to be a descendant of Genghis Khan either, as in 1370 he installed a puppet khan as the ruler of the Chagatai, in recognition of the Mongol laws that only a blood descendant of Genghis Khan was allowed to rule. (Marozzi, p. 342)
- Jump up^ Richard C. Martin, Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World A-L, Macmillan Reference USA, 2004, ISBN 978-0-02-865604-5, p. 134.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Manz, Beatrice Forbes (1988). "Tamerlane and the symbolism of sovereignty". Iranian Studies 21 (1-2): 105–122. doi:10.1080/00210868808701711.
- Jump up^ The Descendants of Sayyid Ata and the Rank of Naqīb in Central Asia by Devin DeWeese Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 115, No. 4 (Oct. – Dec., 1995), pp. 612–634
- Jump up^ Four studies on the history of Central Asia, Volume 1 By Vasilij Vladimirovič Bartold p.19
- Jump up^ Islamic art By Barbara Brend p.130
- Jump up^ Virani, Shafique N. The Ismailis in the Middle Ages: A History of Survival, A Search for Salvation (New York: Oxford University Press), 2007, p. 114.
- Jump up^ Sinor, D., "XIV The Making of a Great Khan", page 242, Studies in Medieval Inner Asia, Variorum, 1997. ISBN 0-86078-632-3
- Jump up^ Radloff, W., Proben der Volkslitteratur der türkischen stämme Süd-Sibiriens, IV. St Petersburg, page 308
- ^ Jump up to:a b Manz, Beatrice Forbes (2002). "Tamerlane's Career and Its Uses". Journal of World History 13: 3.doi:10.1353/jwh.2002.0017.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Nicholas V. Raisanovsky; Mark D. Steinberg: A History of Russia Seventh Edition, pg 93
- ^ Jump up to:a b Chaliand, Gerard; Arnaud Blin (2007). The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda. University of California Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0520247093.
- Jump up^ Fisher, W.B.; Jackson, P.; Lockhart, L.; Boyle, J.A. : The Cambridge History of Iran, p55.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Virani, Shafique N. The Ismailis in the Middle Ages: A History of Survival, A Search for Salvation (New York: Oxford University Press), 2007, p. 116.
- Jump up^ Singh, Raj Pal. Rise of the Jat power. Books.google.co.in. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
- Jump up^ [1][dead link]
- Jump up^ Hunter, Sir William Wilson (1909). "The Indian Empire: Timur's invasion 1398". The Imperial Gazetteer of India 2. p. 366.
- Jump up^ Mallu who later received the title of Iqbal Khan was a noble in Siri an ally of Muqarrab Khan. But later on betrayed him and Nusrat Khan, and allied with Nasir-ud-din Mahmud Shah. History Of Medieval India; V.D. Mahajan p.205
- Jump up^ "The Turco-Mongol Invasions". Rbedrosian.com. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
- Jump up^ Aleppo:the Ottoman Empire's caravan city, Bruce Masters,The Ottoman City Between East and West: Aleppo, Izmir, and Istanbul, ed. Edhem Eldem, Daniel Goffman, Bruce Master, (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 20.
- Jump up^ Margaret Meserve, Empires of Islam in Renaissance Historical Thought, (Harvard University Press, 2008), 207.
- Jump up^ Stevens, John. The history of Persia. Containing, the lives and memorable actions of its kings from the first erecting of that monarchy to this time; an exact Description of all its Dominions; a curious Account of India, China, Tartary, Kermon, Arabia, Nixabur, and the Islands of Ceylon and Timor; as also of all Cities occasionally mention'd, as Schiras, Samarkand, Bokara, &c. Manners and Customs of those People, Persian Worshippers of Fire; Plants, Beasts, Product, and Trade. With many instructive and pleasant digressions, being remarkable Stories or Passages, occasionally occurring, as Strange Burials; Burning of the Dead; Liquors of several Countries; Hunting; Fishing; Practice of Physick; famous Physicians in the East; Actions of Tamerlan, &c. To which is added, an abridgment of the lives of the kings of Harmuz, or Ormuz. The Persian history written in Arabick, by Mirkond, a famous Eastern Author that of Ormuz, by Torunxa, King of that Island, both of them translated into Spanish, by Antony Teixeira, who liv'd several Years in Persia and India; and now render'd into English.
- Jump up^ Graziella Caselli, Gillaume Wunsch, Jacques Vallin (2005). "Demography: Analysis and Synthesis, Four Volume Set: A Treatise in Population". Academic Press. p.34. ISBN 0-12-765660-X
- Jump up^ Turnbull, Stephen (30 January 2007). The Great Wall of China 221 BC-1644 AD. Osprey Publishing. p. 23.ISBN 978-1-84603-004-8. Retrieved 2010-03-26.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Tsai, Shih-Shan Henry (2002), Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle (2 ed.), University of Washington Press, pp. 188–189, ISBN 0-295-98124-5
- Jump up^ C. P. Atwood-Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire, see: Northern Yuan Dynasty
- Jump up^ Adela C.Y. Lee. "Tamerlane (1336–1405) – ''The Last Great Nomad Power''". Silkroad Foundation. Retrieved2012-05-22.
- Jump up^ Tsia 2002, p. 161
- Jump up^ Document preserved at Le Musée de l'Histoire de France, code AE III 204. Mentioned Dossier II, 7, J936
- Jump up^ Mentioned Dossier II, 7 bis
- Jump up^ Mentioned Dossier II, 7 ter
- Jump up^ Frances Carney Gies (September–October 1978). "The Man Who Met Tamerlane". Saudi Aramco World 29 (5).
- Jump up^ Manz, Beatrice Forbes (1999). The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane. Cambridge University Press, p.109. ISBN 0-521-63384-2. Limited preview at Google Books. p.109. "In Temür's government, as in those of most nomad dynasties, it is impossible to find a clear distinction between civil and military affairs, or to identify the Persian bureaucracy as solely civil or the Turko-Mongolian solely with military government. In fact, it is difficult to define the sphere of either side of the administration and we find Persians and Chaghatays sharing many tasks. (In discussing the settled bureaucracy and the people who worked within it I use the word Persian in a cultural rather than ethnological sense. In almost all the territories which Temür incorporated into his realm Persian was the primary language of administration and literary culture. Thus the language of the settled 'diwan' was Persian and its scribes had to be thoroughly adept in Persian culture, whatever their ethnic origin.) Temür's Chaghatay emirs were often involved in civil and provincial administration and even in financial affairs, traditionally the province of Persian bureaucracy."
- Jump up^ Roy, Olivier (2007). The new Central Asia. I.B. Tauris. p. 7. ISBN 1-84511-552-X.
- Jump up^ "History of the Nestorians".
- Jump up^ "Iqbal’S Hindu Relations". The Telegraph (Calcutta, India). 30 June 2007.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Hameed ud-Din (2011). "Abū Ṭāleb Ḥosaynī".Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 17 September 2014.
- Jump up^ Milwright, Marcus (2006). "So Despicable a Vessel: Representations of Tamerlane in Printed Books of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries". Muqarnas 23: 317.doi:10.1163/22118993-90000105.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Knobler, Adam (November 1995). "The Rise of Timur and Western Diplomatic Response, 1390–1405". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Third Series 5 (3).doi:10.1017/s135618630000660x.
- Jump up^ The History of Timur-Bec 1. 1723. pp. xii–ix.Punctuation and spelling modernized.
- Jump up^ Anthropological composition of the population of Central Asia: and the ethnogenesis of its peoples by Lev Vasilʹevich Oshanin, Henry Field
- Jump up^ "Uzbekistan: On the bloody trail of". The Independent(London). 9 July 2006. Retrieved 25 May 2010.
- Jump up^ Mark & Ruth Dickens. "Timurid Architecture in Samarkand". Oxuscom.com. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
- Jump up^ Marozzi 2004
- Jump up^ Enrique Serrano (2011-01-02). Tamerlan (Biblioteca Breve) (Spanish Edition). ISBN 9789584205407. Retrieved2012-05-22.
REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
Media related to Timur at Wikimedia Commons- Timur at Encyclopædia Britannica
- Forbes, Andrew, & Henley, David: Timur's Legacy: The Architecture of Bukhara and Samarkand (CPA Media)
- Narrative of the Embassy of Ruy Gonzalez De Clavijo to the Court of Timour, at Samarcand, A.D.1403-6 – Full text at Google Books.
- Ruy González de Clavijo, Embassy to Tamerlane, 1403-1406, translated by Guy Le Strange, with a new Introduction by Caroline Stone (Hardinge Simpole, 2009).
- Nationality or Religion: Views of Central Asian Islam
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_Timur_Museum
The Amir Timur Museum is a museum in the city of Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan. It is well known for its distinctive blue dome and ornate interior and ...
-
asianhistory.about.com › ... › Asian Countries S to Y › Uzbekistan
That was not the Central Asian conqueror's actual name, though. More properly, he is known as Timur, from the Turkic word for "iron." Amir Timur is remembered ...
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/596358/Timur
Apr 15, 2014 - Timur thus grew up in what was known as the Chagatai khanate. After the death in 1357 of Transoxania's current ruler, Amir Kazgan, Timur ...
www.advantour.com › Silk Road › Central Asia › Uzbekistan › Tashkent
The history of the square in the center of Tashkent named after Amir Timur, the commander and founder of a huge medieval empire, began as early as in the XIX ...
orexca.com/p_tamerlane.shtml
Tamerlane (Amir Temur, Temur the Great) (1336-1405) was a man of a complex, multi-faceted personality. He forged his own destiny and became a prominent ...
en.hamrohonim.net/amir-temur
In Tirmidh, he had come under the influence of his spiritual mentor Sayyid Barakah, a Shiite leader from Balkh who is buried alongside Timur in Gur-e Amir.
hubpages.com › ... › History and Archaeology › History of Asia
Dec 14, 2013 - When Tughlugh Khan died and entrusted Transoxiania to his son Ilyas,Timur and his brother-in-law, Amir Husayn, sensed their opportunity ...
sambuh.com/en/uzbekistan/history-of-uzbekistan.html
Central Asia is one of the most ancient regions inhabited by one of the oldest centers of human cultures, as attested by numerous relics. The territory of present ...
-
-
Timur, historically known as Tamerlane, was a
A Timurid era illustration of Emir Timur
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment