28th January 1846 British Forcibly Separated Kashmir From Sikhs And Sold To Maharaja Of Jammu
First Anglo-Sikh War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| First Anglo-Sikh War | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
.png) Topographical map of The Punjab The Land of 5 Waters | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
.svg){kind=small} East India Company Patiala State[1][2]Jind State[3] |  Sikh Empire | ||||||
| ||
The First Anglo-Sikh War was fought between the Sikh Empire and the East India Company between 1845 and 1846. It resulted in partial subjugation of the Sikh kingdom.
CONTENTS
[hide]BACKGROUND AND CAUSES OF THE WAR[EDIT]
The Sikh kingdom of Punjab was expanded and consolidated by Maharajah Ranjit Singh during the early years of the nineteenth century, about the same time as the British-controlled territories were advanced by conquest or annexation to the borders of the Punjab. Ranjit Singh maintained a policy of wary friendship with the British, ceding some territory south of the Sutlej River,[4] while at the same time building up his military forces both to deter aggression by the British and to wage war against the Afghans. He hired American and European mercenary soldiers to train his artillery, and also incorporated contingents of Hindus and Muslims into his army.
Aided by disunity among the Afghans, the Sikhs conquered the cities and provinces of Peshawar and Multan from them, and also incorporated the states of Jammu and Kashmir into their empire. Once order was restored in Afghanistan, the British became obsessed with idea that Emir Dost Mohammed Khan of Afghanistan was conspiring with Imperial Russia and launched the First Anglo-Afghan War to replace him with the compliant Shuja Shah Durrani. This move had Sikh support, in return for the formal cessation of Peshawar to the Sikhs by Shuja Shah. Initially successful, the British invasion took a disastrous turn with the Massacre of Elphinstone's Army, which lowered the prestige of the British, and the Bengal Army of the British East India Company in particular. The British finally withdrew from Afghanistan, and from Peshawar which they held as an advance base, in 1842.
Events in the Punjab[edit]
Ranjit Singh died in 1839. Almost immediately, his kingdom began to fall into disorder. Ranjit's unpopular legitimate son, Kharak Singh, was removed from power within a few months, and later died in prison under mysterious circumstances. It was widely believed that he was poisoned.[5] He was replaced by his able but estranged son Kanwar Nau Nihal Singh, who also died within a few months in suspicious circumstances; he was crushed by a falling archway at the Lahore Fort while returning from his father's cremation.[5]
There were at the time two major factions within the Punjab contending for power and influence: the Sikh Sindhanwalias and the Hindu Dogras. The Dogras succeeded in raising Sher Singh, the eldest illegitimate son of Ranjit Singh, to the throne in January 1841. The most prominent Sindhanwalias took refuge on British territory, but had many adherents among the Army of the Punjab.
The army was expanding rapidly in the aftermath of Ranjit Singh's death, from 29,000 (with 192 guns) in 1839 to over 80,000 in 1845[6] as landlords and their retainers took up arms. It proclaimed itself to be the Khalsa, or embodiment of the Sikh nation. Its regimental panchayats (committees) formed an alternate power source within the kingdom, declaring thatGuru Gobind Singh's ideal of the Sikh commonwealth had been revived, with the Sarbatt Khalsa or the Sikh as a whole assuming all executive, military and civil authority in the State,[7] which British observers decried as a "dangerous military democracy". British representatives and visitors in the Punjab described the regiments as preserving "puritanical" order internally, but also as being in a perpetual state of mutiny or rebellion against the central Durbar (court). In one notorious instance of unrest, Sikh soldiers ran riot, looking for anyone who looked as if they could speak Persian (the language used by the clerks who administered the Khalsa's finances) and putting them to the sword.
Maharajah Sher Singh was unable to meet the pay demands of the Khalsa, although he reportedly lavished funds on a degenerate court. In September 1843 he was murdered by his cousin, an officer of the Khalsa, Ajit Singh Sindhanwalia. The Dogras took their revenge on those responsible, and Jind Kaur, Ranjit Singh's youngest widow, became Regent for her infant son Duleep Singh. After the VizierHira Singh was killed, while attempting to flee the capital with loot from the Royal Treasury (Toshkana), by troops under Sham Singh Attariwala,[7] Jind Kaur's brother Jawahar Singh became Vizier in December 1844. In 1845 he arranged the assassination of Peshaura Singh, who presented a threat to Duleep Singh. For this, he was called to account by the Khalsa. Despite attempts to bribe the army he was butchered to death in September 1845 in the presence of Jind Kaur and Duleep Singh.[8]
The Khalsa nevertheless did not take over the kingdom at this point. Although Jind Kaur publicly vowed revenge against her brother's murderers, she remained Regent. Lal Singh became Vizier, and Tej Singh became commander of the army. Sikh historians have stressed that both these men were prominent in the Dogra faction. Originally high-caste Hindus from outside the Punjab, both had converted to Sikhism in 1818.
British actions[edit]
Immediately after the death of Ranjit Singh, the British East India Company had begun increasing its military strength, particularly in the regions adjacent to the Punjab, establishing a military cantonment at Ferozepur, only a few miles from the Sutlej River which marked the frontier between British-ruled India and the Punjab. In 1843, they conquered and annexedSindh, to the south of the Punjab, in a move which many British people regarded as cynical and ignoble.[9] This did not gain the British any respect in the Punjab, and increased suspicions of British motives.
The actions and attitudes of the British, under Governors General Lord Ellenborough and his successor, Sir Henry Hardinge, are disputed. By most British accounts, their main concern was that the Khalsa, without strong leadership to restrain them, was a serious threat to British territories along the border. Sikh and Indian historians have countered that the military preparations made by these Governors General were offensive in nature; for example, they prepared bridging trains and siege gun batteries, which would be unlikely to be required in a purely defensive operation.[7]
The British attitudes were affected by reports from their new Political Agent in the frontier districts, Major George Broadfoot, who stressed the disorder in the Punjab and recounted every tale of corrupt behaviour at the court. For some British officials, there was a strong desire to expand British influence and control into the Punjab, as it was the only remaining formidable force that could threaten the British hold in India and the last remaining independent kingdom not under British influence. The kingdom was also renowned for being the wealthiest, the Koh-i-Noor being but one of its many treasures. Despite this, it is unlikely that the British East India Company would have deliberately attempted to annex the Punjab had the war not occurred, as they simply did not have the manpower or resources to keep a hold on the territories (as proven by the outbreak of the Second Anglo-Sikh War).[citation needed]
Nevertheless, the unconcealed and seemingly aggressive British military build-up at the borders had the effect of increasing tension within the Punjab and the Khalsa.
OUTBREAK AND COURSE OF THE WAR[EDIT]
After mutual demands and accusations between the Sikh Durbar and the East India Company, diplomatic relations were broken. An East India Company army began marching towards Ferozepur, where a division was already stationed. This army was commanded by Sir Hugh Gough, the Commander in Chief of the Bengal Army, and was accompanied by Sir Henry Hardinge, the British Governor General of Bengal, who placed himself beneath Gough in the military chain of command. The British East India Company forces consisted of formations of theBengal Army, with usually one British unit to every three or four Bengal infantry or cavalry units. Most of the artillery on the British side consisted of light guns from the elite Bengal Horse Artillery.
In response to the British move, the Sikh army began crossing the Sutlej on 11 December 1845. Although the leaders and principal units of the army were Sikhs, there were also Punjabi, Pakhtun andKashmiri infantry units. The artillery consisted mainly of units of heavy guns, which had been organised and trained by European mercenaries.
The Sikhs claimed they were only moving into Sikh possessions (specifically the village of Moran, whose ownership was disputed) on the east side of the river, but the move was regarded by the British as clearly hostile and they declared war. One Sikh army under Tej Singh advanced towards Ferozepur but made no effort to surround or attack the exposed British division there. Another force under Lal Singh clashed with Gough's and Hardinge's advancing forces at the Battle of Mudki on 18 December. The British won an untidy encounter battle.
On the next day, the British came in sight of the large Sikh entrenchment at Ferozeshah. Gough wished to attack at once, but Hardinge used his position as Governor General to overrule him and order him to wait for the division from Ferozepur to arrive. When they appeared late on 21 December, Gough attacked in the few hours of daylight left. The well served Sikh artillery caused heavy casualties among the British, and their infantry fought desperately. On the other hand, the elite of the Sikh army, the irregular cavalry or ghodachadas (alt. gorracharra, horse-mounted), were comparatively ineffective against Gough's infantry and cavalry as they had been kept from the battlefield by Lal Singh.
By nightfall, some of Gough's army had fought their way into the Sikh positions, but other units had been driven back in disorder. Hardinge expected a defeat on the following day and ordered the state papers at Mudki to be burned in this event. However, on the following morning, the British and Bengal Army units rallied and drove the Sikhs from the rest of their fortifications. Lal Singh had made no effort to rally or reorganise his army. At this point, Tej Singh's army appeared. Once again, Gough's exhausted army faced defeat and disaster, but Tej Singh inexplicably withdrew, claiming that British cavalry and artillery which were withdrawing to replenish ammunition were actually making an outflanking move.
_in_boats._10_February_1846.jpg)
Operations temporarily halted, mainly because Gough's army was exhausted and required rest and reinforcements. The Sikhs were temporarily dismayed by their defeats and by their commanders' actions, but rallied when fresh units and leaders joined them, and Maharani Jind Kaur exhorted 500 selected officers to make renewed efforts.
When hostilities resumed, a Sikh detachment crossed the Sutlej near Aliwal, threatening Gough's lines of supply and communications. A division under Sir Harry Smith was sent to deal with them. Sikh cavalry attacked Smith continually on his march and captured his baggage, but Smith received reinforcements and at theBattle of Aliwal on 28 January 1846, he won a model victory, eliminating the Sikh bridgehead.
Gough's main army had now been reinforced, and rejoined by Smith's division, they attacked the main Sikh bridgehead at Sobraon on 10 February. Tej Singh is said to have deserted the Sikh army early in the battle. Although the Sikh army resisted as stubbornly as at Ferozeshah, Gough's troops eventually broke into their position. The bridges behind the Sikhs broke under British artillery fire, or were ordered to be destroyed behind him by Tej Singh (ostensibly to prevent British pursuit). The Sikh army was trapped. None of them surrendered, and the British troops showed little mercy. This defeat effectively broke the Sikh army.
AFTERMATH[EDIT]
,_entering_his_palace_in_Lahore,_escorted_by_British_troops.jpg)
In the Treaty of Lahore on 9 March 1846, the Sikhs were made to surrender the valuable region (the Jullundur Doab) between the Beas River and Sutlej River. The Lahore Durbar was also required to pay an indemnity of 15 million rupees. Because it could not readily raise this sum, it ceded Kashmir, Hazarah and all the forts, territories, rights and interests in the hill countries situated between the Rivers Beas and Indus to the East India Company, as equivalent to ten million of rupees.[10] In a later separate arrangement (the Treaty of Amritsar), the Raja of Jammu, Gulab Singh, purchased Kashmir from the East India Company for a payment of 7.5 million rupees and was granted the title Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.[11]
Maharaja Duleep Singh remained ruler of the Punjab and at first his mother, Maharani Jindan Kaur, remained as Regent. However, the Durbar later requested that the British presence remain until the Maharaja attained the age of 16. The British consented to this and on 16 December 1846, the Treaty of Bhyroval provided for the Maharani to be awarded a pension of 150,000 rupees and be replaced by a British resident in Lahore supported by a Council of Regency, with agents in other cities and regions.[12] This effectively gave the East India Company control of the government.
Sikh historians have always maintained that, in order to retain their hold on power and maintain the figurehead rule of Duleep Singh, Lal Singh and Tej Singh embarked on the war with the deliberate intent of breaking their own army[citation needed]. In particular, Lal Singh was corresponding with a British political officer and betraying state and military secrets throughout the war. Lal Singh's and Tej Singh's desertion of their armies and refusal to attack when opportunity offered seem inexplicable otherwise.
The Sikh empire was until then one of the few remaining kingdoms in India after the rise of the company and the fall of the Mughal empire. Although the Khalsa was weakened by the war, resentment at British interference in the government led to the Second Anglo-Sikh War within three years.
SOURCES[EDIT]
- Farwell, Byron (1973). Queen Victoria's little wars. Wordsworth Editions. ISBN 1-84022-216-6.
- Featherstone, Donald (2007). At Them with the Bayonet: The First Anglo-Sikh War 1845-1846. Leonnaur Books.
- Hernon, Ian (2003). Britain's forgotten wars. Sutton Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0-7509-3162-0.
- A highly fictionalised (lasicivious, titillating and scurrilous) description of the origins and course of the First Anglo-Sikh War (as well as various Sikh fortifications including breastworks) can be found in the comedy/adventure novel Flashman and the Mountain of Light by George MacDonald Fraser (1990). However, the book's well-researched footnotes are a source for serious historical information and further reading, such as the memoirs of some of the principals involved.
SEE ALSO[EDIT]
| Preceded by Third Anglo-Maratha War | Indo–British conflicts | Succeeded by Second Anglo-Sikh War |
REFERENCES[EDIT]
- ^ http://www.royalark.net/India/patiala3.htm
- ^ http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/punjab-polls-six-clans-dominate-the-political-and-social-landscape/1/168682.html
- ^ http://books.google.co.in/books?id=vOPb4SnrsWAC&pg=PA169&lpg=PA169&dq=maratha+cis-sutlej&source=bl&ots=V_vCKSjfnZ&sig=ci_iGUHpVuIFfGMl3M1d0KCtnbE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ruLHT_WuBszIrQea6cDGDg&ved=0CE0Q6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=maratha%20cis-sutlej&f=false
- ^ Allen, Charles (2001). Soldier Sahibs. Abacus. p. 28. ISBN 0-349-11456-0.
- ^ a b Hernon, p. 546
- ^ Hernon, p. 547
- ^ a b c allaboutsikhs.com - dead link
- ^ Hernon, p. 548
- ^ Farwell, p. 30
- ^ Terms of the Treaty of Lahore
- ^ Terms of the Treaty of Amritsar
- ^ Terms of the Treaty of Bhyroval
EXTERNAL LINKS[EDIT]
 | Wikimedia Commons has media related to First Anglo-Sikh War. |
- First Anglo-Sikh War
- Anglo-Sikh Wars
| ||
| ||
Categories:
- Anglo-Sikh wars
- Conflicts in 1845
- Conflicts in 1846
- Battles involving the Sikhs
- Military history of British India
- History of Sikhism
- 1845 in India
- 1846 in India
Treaty of Amritsar, 1846
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThis article is about the 1846 treaty. For the 1809 treaty, see Treaty of Amritsar, 1809.The Treaty of Amritsar, signed on 16 March 1846, formalised the arrangements in the Treaty of Lahore between theBritish East India Company and Maharaja Gulab Singh Dogra after the First Anglo-Sikh War.[1] By Article 1 of the treaty, Gulab Singh acquired "all the hilly or mountainous country with its dependencies situated to the eastward of the River Indus and the westward of the River Ravi including Chamba and excluding Lahul, being part of the territories ceded to the British Government by the Lahore State according to the provisions of Article IV of the Treaty of Lahore, dated 9th March, 1846." Under Article 3, Gulab Singh was to pay 75 lakhs (7.5 million) of Nanak Shahi rupees (the ruling currency of the Sikh Empire) to the British Government, along with other annual tributes.[1] The Treaty of Amritsar marked the beginning ofDogra rule in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.[2]SEE ALSO[EDIT]
About 24,500 results(0.72 seconds) SEARCH RESULTS
Kashmir - Pakistan Mission to UN
www.pakun.org/kashmir/India's forcible occupation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947 is the ... In that year, the British defeated the Sikhs and sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh of Jammu for ... Gulab Singh, the Mahraja, signed a separate treaty with the British which ... nearly 80 per cent of who were Muslims, rose against Maharaja Hari Singh's ...You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 28/1/15Kashmir and Jammu (princely state) - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_and_Jammu_(princely_state)In the winter of 1845, war broke out between the British and the Sikhs. .... signatures ofMaharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir and Viscount Mountbatten of ...The current agitation in Indian-Held Kashmir is rooted in the ...
www.worldbulletin.net/servisler/haberYazdir/146986/haberOct 25, 2014 - India's forcible occupation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947 is ... In that year, the British defeated the Sikhs and sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh of Jammu ... Gulab Singh, the Mahraja, signed a separate treaty with the British ... per cent of who were Muslims, rose against Maharaja Hari Singh's rule.You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 28/1/15Koshur Samachar Articles - Kashmiri Overseas Association
koausa.org/koshursamachar/affairs.htmlForcible conversions, killings, destruction of temples and exquisite monuments and ... Thus Kashmir passed into the hands of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. ... The outcome was First Sikh War in which Sikhs suffered a defeat because of the wile .... against the breaking of Jammu and Kashmir State but Maharaja Hari Singh earned ...Why confusion over status of Jammu & Kashmir? - Vijayvaani
www.vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3003by Hari Om, on 06 Nov 2013, 12 Comments ... But the people of the former princely State of Jammu & Kashmir ... state in the country which has a separate constitution and separate flag. ..... In that year, the British defeated the Sikhs and sold Kashmirto Gulab Singh of ... However, unease with the Maharaja's rule continued.JiihtJeouk | Activity Streams | HempShare™ | Page 245361
hempshare.org/members/djbcywtm/activity/245361/India's forcible profession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir around 1947 is the main reason ... In that yr, the British defeated a Sikhs and sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh ... Gulab Singh, the Mahraja, signed a separate treaty with the British which ... 80 percentage of who were Muslims, rose against Maharaja Hari Singh's rule.PifhtAoaw | Activity Streams | HempShare™ | Page 220010
hempshare.org/members/mtipuyjo/activity/220010/India's forcible occupation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir with 1947 is the ... In that yr, the British defeated your Sikhs and sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh of Jammu... Gulab Singh, the Mahraja, signed a separate agreement with the British ... nearly 80 percent of who were Muslims, rose against Maharaja Hari Singh's rule.KASHMIR ISSUE BEGINS WITH THE INSTRUMENT OF ...
indiafacts.co.in/kashmir-issue-begins-instrument-accession/Oct 27, 2014 - From 1846 up to 1947, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state under the ... Majority Kashmir should be sold to the Dogra ruler of Jammu under the ... Poonch, located to the west of Kashmir, was initially administered as a separate state .... state to Maharaja Hari Singh after the lapse of British paramountcy. Facts about Kashmir - StrategyPage
www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/72-9685.aspxMar 29, 2005 - 9 posts - 3 authorsLocation The State of Jammu and Kashmir is bordered in north by China, east by ... which separates Azad Kashmir from Occupied Kashmir, is a routine affair. ... In that year, the British defeated the Sikhs and sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh of ... of whom were Muslims, rose against Maharaja Hari Singh's rule.Kashmir peace is long climb, shadows Obama trip to India ...
peoplesworld.org/kashmir-peace-is-long-climb-shadows-obama-trip-to-i...Oct 29, 2010 - Most of what you hear regarding Kashmir is violence, separatists and the ... Kashmir was ruled by the last of the maharajas, Hari Singh. ... The Indian Constitution grants a special status to Jammu and Kashmir, which is the current .... This was an illegal transaction and The British had no right to sell Kashmir.
No comments:
Post a Comment